Scatter brain

Tuesday, March 15, 2005

Is Britain in the throes of a quiet coup?

New Labour, Britain's main "Socialist" party and incumbent government:
  1. Appointed a "Minister without portfolio" to the Cabinet. read :- Propaganda minister
  2. Are trying to introduce ID-Smart-Cards. what information will government departments be able to access about you then? Will you require one in order to get basic services? a job?
  3. The Ex Home Secretary David Blunkett is widely thought of as the most right wing Home Secretary that there has been.
  4. Took Britain to war, against Iraq (Gulf War II), a sovereign, albeit a dictatorship, country that has never attacked Britain or our allies, and whose infrastructure was not capable of such an attack
  5. Has removed powers from the House of Lords (the 2nd chamber of our government) to the point that it is no longer able to block, only delay, the will of the House of parliament to introduce unfair-fair or bad laws. I.E. they have effectively removed the body that applies the "checks and balances" on parliament to make sure it doesn't usurp power.
  6. Used a "War on terror" scare to pass a law "Prevention of Terrorism Bill" that allows the government to imprison anybody indefinitely without trial or the burden of proof if the Home Secretary says that they are dissidents.
  7. David Blunkett was on the radio today hyping up a speech he made today suggesting that the English should have more pride in their Nation identity and traditions.
In January 1933 in Germany there was a "Socialist" political party that came to power, employed propaganda, removed all the checks and balances preventing the leader of the house (the Chancellor) from assuming absolute power, made people carry Papers (ID-Cards) stating their race,religion and other details of interest to the state, attacked a sovereign Nation (Poland) that had not threatened or attacked them or their allies and tried to re-fashion a sense of National Identity and traditions.

They were called the "National Socialist German Workers Party" or in German "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei", which was usually shortened to the "Nazi" party.


Tuesday, March 08, 2005

Banana Republic

The European Commission has controversialy adopted its Common Position on the software patent directive.
Despite the fact that it is against the commission's own rules and is opposed by the Open Source Software community, most developers, small businesses and sensible full member countries such as Denmark.

The only people who want Software patents are the greedy corporations who see them as a means to block competition from the Free (as in freedom) software and small entrepreneurial businesses.

The basics, dangers, untruths and politics as well as the blatant unfairness of such patents are comprehensively demonstrated by the FFII (Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure) but I'll briefly summarise here.
1) We don't need them. Microsoft, Oracle and other large software vendors got rich without patents. Copyright law is already sufficient to protect an authors rights.

2) Patents are a form of State sponsored Monopoly, the state will help enforce the monopoly to protect the patent holder. The idea being that in order to encourage good ideas and invention (which is good for society) in a country the inventor should be given a 20 window to exploit the idea by patenting it, which in effect documents fully how to re-create the invention, then the patent ends and the idea enters the public domain for the good of society at large. Software patents are being handed out for unoriginal ideas or in areas of common practice where prior art already exists! This would enable a patent holder to force any of its competition to pay for its licenses for practices that they are doing that the patent holder didn't even invent!

3) The cost of defending yourself in court from an unfair patent claim can be enormous. This means that just the threat of a court case can drive competition out of the market even if the claim or the patent are bogus.

4) In the USA the speed at which software patents are being filed caused the patent office to change its procedures so that instead of the rigorous proof traditionally applied to patents (e.g. is it a new idea or a significant improvement on existing technology? Is it non-obvious to an expert in that field? Is there prior art? Is it already common knowledge, does someone already own the patent!? etc) was taking too much time and effort and so they now just let a company claim a patent and then let the courts decide! The court system will profit and so will Big business because this again this makes it expensive for the little guy if a software giant alleges that the patent he owns is theirs and a court battle ensues. Will this happen here in Europe?

5) The effect of monopolies and removing competition and entrepreneurial spirit from an economy is disastrous and always leads to worse products (software) and higher prices. As we become more and more dependent on computers and software to handle our lives (and money!) Do we really want worse software with bad security at a higher price?

6) Some of the best software in the world is Free(as in freedom) Open Source software. You are probably reading this blog because it has been served up by open source web servers that has been running continuously 24/7 for months if not years , the firmware in your home router/firewall is more than likely based on GNULinux operating system. Which in itself is free and just works. Do you want to loose all of that and put up with the Support centre panacea, "Have you tried re-booting it?"

Support Denmark and other thinking Democracies and help protest about powerful laws being railroaded in to crush the likes of you and me, by un-elected Corporations.


Please Support Denmark and protect the EU from dangerous unelected monopolies

Saturday, March 05, 2005

WiFi Security locking your front door

In reponse to How Secure is WEP?

In-real-life having any locked door is better than no door.

IMHO this is because a pros/cons calculation is performed in the mind of a
potential "Burglar". Even though breaking in is technically easy it requires
the "Burglar" to make a conscious decision to break the law, weighing up
the risk of being seen or leaving evidence to the benefit of routing around
in other people property.

However, imagine that you had the power to get into someone's house without
leaving evidence that ties the crime to you, or even any evidence that a
break-in has occurred. i.e. you completely remove the negative from the
risk/reward calculation. Would you look in you next door neighbours house?
or through the files of a business competitor? It would certainly be more
tempting.

The fact that this cracking a WEP key is relatively easy and not "a very
difficult problem", as is the case with high grade cryptography found in SSL
for instance. Tied to the fact that the act of cracking a WEP key is a
purely passive experience in that you don't need to advertise your presence
by sending out radio signals but just sit and receive them, so you can take
as long as you want to do it, and that even after you have cracked it and
joined the WiFi network, there is no switched network or IP address that
will give away your physical location, and you can be in a car ready to
drive away should someone be sophisticated enough to home in on your signal
make WEP cracking a pretty painless experience with a potentially massive
upside.

Given that most Wifi networks aren't run by security agencies with the
skills and resource to implement counter-surveillance but average Windoze
users at home or in their offices, there is almost no chance of getting
caught at it, and so it becomes a real possibility that if you have such a
network then so-called war-drivers may have had a look at it.

While this may be bad news for people who operate their WiFi networks using
plain WEP or its relatively more safe variants what's the problem for
everyone else?
The Problem is that cracked WiFi networks are the perfect place for the
average "script-kiddie" or more evil people to launch internet attacks from.
Such attacks may just want to create a Distributed Denial of Service attack
an a DNS server in order to intercept a targets requests but the collateral
damage is that viruses and worms are released into the wild in order to
achieve that aim, and as a side effect mess up other people's computers. The
perpetrator will be very difficult to catch in the act, but also should the
authorities trace the source of the attack it will be the legitimate user,
whose network the prep. masqueraded behind who is in the frame.

If this is not bad enough, and you think it serves people right for using
easily virused operating system, what would you do if some one was
committing very bad crimes or downloading illegal child pR0n from your
connection?

While this is a bleak picture, all is not lost.

As you say, cycle your keys at least once a week.
Don't reboot the access point unless you have to.
Do place firewalls on all machines on the internal network if they are
accessible from the WiFi access point.
Do implement a high grade cryptographic Virtual private network (VPN)
between all your hosts (most decent firewalls can handle this) - while it
doesn't prevent anyone joining your network, it does prevent them from
sniffing your network traffic and makes it a LOT harder for them to get into
your computers.
If your WiFi access point allows it do set it up such that only known WiFi
card MAC(hardware) addresses are allowed to join the network. If a cracker
breaks you WEP he still has find a way to join the network.

Whilst these measures are not foolproof, better solutions are on the way
(802.11i for example which was ratified in June 2004) which implements much
harder to crack security.

In Summary you shouldn't be blase about your WiFi's WEP key, but also don't let fear stop you from utilising technology.