Is a spade a spade?
I just went to the toilet at work to be greeted with the sign,
"Restroom closed. Cleaning in progress".
"Restroom"!? The only things I'd rest in there are my sphincters!
It is a toilet.
The trend we see to use "non offensive language", for example "restroom" instead of toilet, or "vertically challenged" instead of short, is a form of control that should be fought at all times.
By limiting the adjectives or nouns in a language we limit the precision of meaning that can be conveyed. If you are unable to convey a specific meaning then conceptually that specification doesn't exist!
The classic example of this is that of the number of words in a language for snow. In Britain we have very few, Snow. A skier will be forced to use adjectives to make his meaning clearer for example "powder snow"
So, for the average Briton there are only two kinds of snow. Snow and powder snow.
An Eskimo will tell you that there are many more types of snow. He is able to be sure of this because in his language there are many more nouns for snow, distinguishing completely different types of snow. He probably has many more adjectives to refine the meaning yet further.
(for further study why not start here http://www.princeton.edu/~browning/snow.html )
A similar refining of language happens in all areas of specialisation. For instance, to a lay-person a hammer is a hammer. But to a craftsman there are many types of hammer, claw-hammer, ball-peen-hammer, sledge-hammer, mallet etc.
If you limit the vocabulary you limit the precision of meaning that can convey and hence you also limit the complexity of ideas that can be discussed and hence perception itself. Are you still sure there are only two kinds of snow in the world?
It is for this reason you should fight to use your language as you want and not succumb to "political correctness".
The powers that be like to use politically correct language because if they can remove "bad" words from the language then the "bad" things vanish with them. It is a semantic trick!
If the word "black" vanishes from the language then conceptually "white vs. black" racism has also disappeared! If there are no toilets and only restrooms then presumable there is no more shit in the world?
Power brokers of all kinds love this trick, because by doing nothing but removing your words they are able to fix all societies problems without doing anything! It also limits your ability to resist their tricks because if you stick to their limited language you will be unable to frame a powerful argument against them!
Take back your language!
Call a spade a spade! (or a shovel or a trowel .... ;-)
"Restroom closed. Cleaning in progress".
"Restroom"!? The only things I'd rest in there are my sphincters!
It is a toilet.
The trend we see to use "non offensive language", for example "restroom" instead of toilet, or "vertically challenged" instead of short, is a form of control that should be fought at all times.
By limiting the adjectives or nouns in a language we limit the precision of meaning that can be conveyed. If you are unable to convey a specific meaning then conceptually that specification doesn't exist!
The classic example of this is that of the number of words in a language for snow. In Britain we have very few, Snow. A skier will be forced to use adjectives to make his meaning clearer for example "powder snow"
So, for the average Briton there are only two kinds of snow. Snow and powder snow.
An Eskimo will tell you that there are many more types of snow. He is able to be sure of this because in his language there are many more nouns for snow, distinguishing completely different types of snow. He probably has many more adjectives to refine the meaning yet further.
(for further study why not start here http://www.princeton.edu/~browning/snow.html )
A similar refining of language happens in all areas of specialisation. For instance, to a lay-person a hammer is a hammer. But to a craftsman there are many types of hammer, claw-hammer, ball-peen-hammer, sledge-hammer, mallet etc.
If you limit the vocabulary you limit the precision of meaning that can convey and hence you also limit the complexity of ideas that can be discussed and hence perception itself. Are you still sure there are only two kinds of snow in the world?
It is for this reason you should fight to use your language as you want and not succumb to "political correctness".
The powers that be like to use politically correct language because if they can remove "bad" words from the language then the "bad" things vanish with them. It is a semantic trick!
If the word "black" vanishes from the language then conceptually "white vs. black" racism has also disappeared! If there are no toilets and only restrooms then presumable there is no more shit in the world?
Power brokers of all kinds love this trick, because by doing nothing but removing your words they are able to fix all societies problems without doing anything! It also limits your ability to resist their tricks because if you stick to their limited language you will be unable to frame a powerful argument against them!
Take back your language!
Call a spade a spade! (or a shovel or a trowel .... ;-)

